Exploring the mysterious gap between black holes and neutron stars

Scientists have discovered an object in a cosmic collision that is denser than previously detected neutron stars but still far less dense than known black holes, challenging the accepted description of neutron stars and black holes, two of the many forms of massive, dying stars in the universe.

Physics professors Patrick Brady andJolienCreighton and a group of 15 other researchers from 51’s Center for Gravitation, Cosmology and Astrophysicscontributed to the recent paper by the LIGO-Virgo Collaboration published inTheAstrophysical Journal Lettersthat investigated the collision.

The end game of massive stars often involves a smashup, called a “compact binary merger,” thatisso violentitproducesgravitational waves – ripples in space-time that can be detected by the LIGOandVirgodetectors.

ٱ󲹳ٳٱ

Now that thesemergerscan be detected,scientists want to furtherexplorethemusingquick follow-upfrom telescopesand instruments thatspotforms of radiation, such as visible light, radio waves, gamma rays and X-rays.This “multi-messenger” investigationis expected to reveal information that helpsphysicists piece togethernew knowledge about the universe.

In this recent paper, the researchers have detected a merger in which one object has a mass that defies the standard description. For decades astronomers have been puzzled by a gap that lies between the mass of neutron stars and black holes: The heaviest known neutron star is no more than 2.5 times the mass of our sun – or 2.5 “solar masses” – and the lightest known black hole is about 5 solar masses.

This newly discovered object lies in this so-called “mass gap.”

In this conversation,ٱ󲹳ٳٱ, a51doctoral researcher and aco-author on the paper,discusses the mass gap andexplainsthe importance of multi-messenger astronomy indeterminingwhethermoreobjects exist in the mass gap.

Scientists don’t know if the object in thecosmicmerger thatLIGO/Virgo found is a neutron star or a black hole. But, since it falls into the “mass gap,” doesٳ󲹳 m𲹲there could be neutron stars that are muchdenserthan we thought?

That is certainly a possibility. This observation means that the lighter object – if it’s a neutron star – is the heaviest one detected so far. Theoretically, neutron stars could have massesofabout 3. However, scientists have only observed them with masses up to 2.5.So, this would change the present belief of how heavy neutron stars can be.

The other possibility is the existence of a lighter black hole. It is believed that black holes have solar masses of more than 5, the upper limit of the mass gap. This also is challengedin case this object is a black hole.

What will scientists have to see in the future to solve the mystery of whether this object was a neutron star or black hole?

This illustration is a face-on “snapshot” from a numerical relativity simulation of the two bodies moments before merger. (Graphic by N. Fischer, S. Ossokine, H. Pfeiffer, A. Buonanno {Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics}, Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes Collaboration)

Observationswith electromagneticradiationare a confident way to solve this. If the neutron star was torn apart by the black hole, the dynamics of the remnant matter could produce light, similar to the neutron star merger GW170817 in 2017. Observation of light would mean this was a neutron star. But unfortunately, this particular event was pretty far away, so the light may be too dim.

There is also the possibility that the neutron star was not torn apart but swallowed by the black hole, in which case there is no light. In the future, if we have a better understanding of what a neutron star is made of–its “equation of state” –we couldrule out black holes withmoreconfidence.

Why is the mass of these objects important? What have we learned about super-massive objects by studying their movements in space?

The masses are a part of the whole story. Compact objects are interesting because they are probes of both extreme matter and extreme gravity. These conditions cannot be reproduced in an Earth-based lab. Therefore, dense compact objects are high-energy astrophysical laboratories. We need super-dense objects colliding in space to produce enough gravitational waves detectable by LIGO. Thus, binary compact object mergers are the most promising source in this regard.

Also, these compact object mergers produce not only gravitational wavesbut also other electromagnetic messengers like gamma-ray bursts and fast-optical transients,calledkilonovae. Currently, there is a global focus onmulti-messengerobservationsbecause each method provides differentinformation.

What aspect of this multi-messenger research effort do you work on?

We stand to learn the most frommulti-messenger observations, but the duration of these events in the skyis very short. We need rapid communication between LIGO and other partner observing facilities to coordinate.

I’m involved with the LIGO low-latency group, where I develop scientific tools that predict if a merger is worth following up. I also develop automated software infrastructure within LIGO to relay the discovery information to astronomers for follow-up.Besides LIGO,Iwork with the Zwicky Transient Facility collaboration, an optical telescopein Californiathat follows up gravitational-wave events to hunt theelusivekilonova.With Zwicky, I work on the sensitivity of such telescopes and develop strategies for follow-up.

Besides Brady, Creighton and Chatterjee, 51 co-authors on the paper include: Caitlin Rose, Ignacio Magana Hernandez, Adam Mercer, Duncan Meacher, MikeManske,XiaoshuLiu, PatrickBrockill, Warren Anderson, Siddharth Mohite,ShaonGhosh,ShasvathKapadia, Tanner Prestegard, Sinead Walsh and Tom Downes.

Top Stories